Review Article

The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Preventing Suicidal Behaviors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Please cite this article as follows: Darvishi N, Farhadi M, Poorolajal J. The role of emotional intelligence in preventing suicidal behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Health Sci. 2025; 25(2):e00643. doi:10.34172/jrhs.2025.178

Background

Suicide is a leading global cause of death, with one person taking their own life every 40 seconds worldwide.¹ Each year, over 800 000 individuals die by suicide worldwide, and for every suicide death, approximately 20 suicide attempts occur.¹ It is a pressing issue that demands effective prevention strategies. Recognizing the importance of promoting mental health and overall well-being, a global target has been set to reduce premature mortality by one-third by 2030, encompassing efforts to address suicide². Protective factors such as social support, problem-solving skills, strong personal relationships, positive coping techniques, and personal belief systems have all been identified as crucial elements in suicide prevention.^1,3,4

One promising technique for reducing suicide rates is the development of emotional intelligence (EI). EI refers to the ability to identify and regulate one’s own emotions, as well as to understand and influence the emotions of others.⁵ Certain components of EI have been found to protect against psychological stress and contribute to strong social support, which, in turn, can help prevent depression and suicidal thoughts.⁶

Research examining the link between EL and suicide has consistently reported that individuals who attempt suicide tend to have lower levels of EI.^7-16 A systematic review conducted by Domínguez-García and Fernández-Berrocal in 2018, covering both English and Spanish literature, specifically highlighted the significant role of high levels of EI in preventing suicidal behavior.¹⁷

While existing research has established a clear connection between EI and suicide, an important gap remains that needs to be addressed. Specifically, no meta-analysis has been conducted to quantitatively assess EI’s potential for preventing suicidal behaviors. This lack of comprehensive analysis limits our understanding of the potential of EI as a prevention strategy. Therefore, this study aimed to fill this gap by providing an up-to-date and thorough analysis of the latest scientific evidence on the relationship between EI and suicide prevention. Through this analysis, we hope to shed light on the potential of EI as a promising strategy for reducing the incidence of suicide.

Methods

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility criteria were established using the Population, Intervention/Exposure, Comparison, Outcome, and Study Design (PICOS) framework to ensure a comprehensive and systematic approach to selecting studies for this review.¹⁸ This framework clearly defines the key components involved in examining the relationship between EI and suicidal behaviors.

Population: Eligible study populations included individuals from the general population, including community-dwelling individuals, students, individuals with alcohol dependence, and patients with mental illness.

Exposure: The primary exposure of interest was the average EI score, measured using any validated tool or questionnaire. Studies were included if they reported EI scores quantitatively such as mean and standard deviation (SD). Higher EI scores were compared with lower EI scores.

Outcome: The primary outcomes of interest encompassed all types of suicidal behaviors, including suicidal ideation, suicide planning, suicide attempts, and death by suicide.

Study design: Observational studies, specifically case-control studies and cross-sectional studies, that assess the relationship between EI and suicidal behaviors were included. There was no restriction based on publication date or language.

Search methods

A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to September 8, 2024, to identify relevant studies. Additionally, reference lists of all retrieved studies and pertinent reviews were screened for additional sources. The search terms used were “emotional intelligence” OR “emotional quotient” OR “social intelligence “AND “suicide” OR “suicidal” OR “suicidality”.

Study selection

The search results obtained from electronic databases were combined, and duplicates were removed using the EndNote software. Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts to determine eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. The authors discussed and resolved disagreements. For further evaluation, the full texts of relevant studies were downloaded.

Data extraction

Data were extracted from relevant studies and entered into an electronic data sheet created using Stata software. The following information was collected: first author’s name, year of publication, country, language, mean age, gender, study population (general population, students, individuals with mental illness), study design (cross-sectional, case-control), suicidal behaviors (suicidal ideation, suicide attempts), period of suicidal behavior (past month, past year, lifetime), sample size, mean score of EI, and its SD.

Methodological quality

The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).¹⁹ Each study was awarded a maximum of nine stars based on criteria related to selection, comparability, and outcome. Studies with seven or more stars were considered high-quality, while those with fewer than seven stars were considered low-quality.²⁰

Heterogeneity and publication bias

Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the chi-square (χ²) test, tau-squared (τ²) test,¹⁸ and I² statistic.²¹ Heterogeneity was categorized as low ( ≤ 50%), moderate (50%-74%), or high ( ≥ 75%), depending on the I² value.²¹ To evaluate potential publication bias, Egger²² and Begg²³ tests were conducted.

Data synthesis

Data were analyzed using Stata software version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and Review Manager 5. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model at a significance level set at 0.05.¹⁸ Since different questionnaires and tools have been used to measure EI in various studies, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used as the summary statistic, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), instead of the normal mean difference. SMD values of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 were considered small, moderate, and large effects, respectively.²⁴

Results

Description of studies

A total of 3470 studies were identified, with 3092 studies retrieved from electronic database searches up to September 8, 2024, and an additional 378 articles found through reference list screening. After removing duplicates and ineligible studies, 10 studies involving 2532 individuals were included.^7-16 However, two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis due to the lack of reported standard deviations for their means (Figure 1). The characteristics of the studies included in this analysis are summarized in Table 1.

Close

Figure 1.

The flow of information through the different phases of the systematic review, including the number of studies identified, screened, and included in the analysis

Figure 1.

The flow of information through the different phases of the systematic review, including the number of studies identified, screened, and included in the analysis

Synthesis of results

The analysis of five studies (Figure 2) indicated that individuals who did not attempt suicide had a significantly higher total EI score compared to those who attempted suicide (SMD = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.58-1.40, P < 0.001). This indicates that the mean EI score for individuals who did not attempt suicide was 0.99 points higher than for those who did, representing a large difference. The between-study heterogeneity was moderate (I² = 73%), and the Begg test (P = 1.000) and Egger test (P = 0.525) showed no evidence of publication bias.

Close

Figure 2.

Forest plot of the association between emotional intelligence and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Note. SMD: Standardized mean difference; The plot shows the SMD and corresponding confidence intervals for each study, as well as the combined SMD for all studies. The figure also includes measures of heterogeneity between studies and statistical tests for publication bias

Figure 2.

Forest plot of the association between emotional intelligence and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Note. SMD: Standardized mean difference; The plot shows the SMD and corresponding confidence intervals for each study, as well as the combined SMD for all studies. The figure also includes measures of heterogeneity between studies and statistical tests for publication bias

In addition, as illustrated in Figure 2, the analysis of three studies revealed that individuals without suicidal ideation had significantly higher total EI scores than those with suicidal ideation (SMD = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.13-0.82, P = 0.007). This suggests that the overall mean EI score of individuals without suicidal attempts was 0.47 higher than those with suicidal attempts, indicating a moderate difference. Moreover, the between-study heterogeneity in this sub-group was high (I² = 83%).

Motahari and Rahgozar conducted a case-control study which found significantly higher average EI scores among individuals who did not attempt suicide compared to those who did (354.16 vs. 230.10, P < 0.001). However, this study was not included in the meta-analysis because the SDs of the means were not reported.¹³ Similarly, a case-control study by Barekatain et al reported that the mean EI score was significantly higher in individuals who did not attempt suicide than in those who did (356.14 vs. 154.12).⁸ These findings align with the meta-analysis results, suggesting that EI may serve as a protective factor against suicide attempts.

Subgroup analysis

Table 2 presents the relationship between EI and suicide attempts across various study designs and population characteristics. Both case-control studies (SMD = 1.33, P < 0.001) and cross-sectional studies (SMD = 0.77, P < 0.030) indicated that individuals without suicide attempts had significantly higher total EI scores compared to those who did. Additionally, subgroup analysis revealed that, in the general population, individuals who did not attempt suicide had a significantly higher total EI score (SMD = 1.33, P < 0.001). In contrast, the association was not significant in populations with mental illness (SMD = 0.86, P = 0.100), suggesting that EI may not provide the same protective effect in this group. A study involving alcoholics indicated a modest significant association (SMD = 0.55, P = 0.040).

Discussion

The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relationship between EI and suicidal behaviors. The results showed that individuals without suicidal ideations and behaviors had significantly higher total EI scores compared to those who attempted suicide. This finding suggests that higher levels of EI may serve as a protective factor against suicidal behaviors. However, the moderate heterogeneity observed between studies indicates that differences in study design, population characteristics, and other factors could contribute to the observed variation in the results.

EI refers to the ability to perceive, use, understand, manage, and regulate emotions effectively. Individuals with high EI can recognize and label their own emotions and can understand other individuals’ emotions. They can use emotional information to guide their thoughts and behaviors, distinguish between different feelings, and appropriately label them. Additionally, they can regulate their own emotions, adapting effectively to various situations. High EI is associated with better emotional regulation, effective communication, and the ability to form strong relationships with others.²⁵

Research has demonstrated that individuals with high EI tend to experience better mental health and social well-being. EI can significantly impact how we think, feel, and act, influencing our ability to manage stress, interact effectively with others, and make sound decisions. Specifically, individuals with high EI are better able to regulate their emotions and respond to the emotions of others in a positive and adaptive manner. This can lead to more fulfilling relationships, greater resilience in the face of adversity, and improved overall well-being.²⁶

EI is closely linked to empathy, as it enables individuals to connect their own emotional experiences with those of others. Individuals with high EI tend to be more empathetic, are better capable of regulating their emotions, and respond appropriately to the emotions of others. In contrast, people with low EI may experience emotional emptiness and exhibit inappropriate emotional reactions. As a result, low EI can be considered a risk factor for developing mental illnesses and can create difficulties in adapting to one’s environment. Therefore, developing EI skills plays a crucial role in improving mental health outcomes and enhancing overall well-being.²⁷

Individuals with low EI may struggle with effective problem-solving and adaptive coping skills when faced with psychological stressors. This can reduce the ability to regulate emotions and respond appropriately to challenging situations.²⁸

Certain components of EI can serve as protective factors against psychological stress. Individuals skilled in emotional regulation tend to experience higher levels of social support, which can help mitigate depression and suicidal thoughts.⁶ EI has been found to make a distinct contribution to understanding the relationship between stress and mental health outcomes such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts.²⁹

Our results suggest that EI may have a protective effect against suicide attempts. However, suicide is a complex phenomenon that involves multiple interacting risks and protective factors, which cannot be reduced to discrete components.^30-33 Instead, these factors must be considered holistically. While risk factors increase the likelihood of suicide, protective factors can help reduce it. When risk and protective factors are balanced, or when protective factors outweigh risk factors, suicide may be prevented.³⁴ Therefore, the role of EI in suicide prevention should be considered alongside other influential factors. Developing and strengthening protective factors, including EI, may serve as an important strategy for suicide prevention and overall mental health and well-being promotion.

There are several limitations to this meta-analysis that should be noted. First, the number of eligible studies investigating the relationship between EI and suicidal ideation and attempts was limited. Therefore, additional research is needed to establish a more robust association between EI and different forms of suicidal behaviors. Second, the studies included in this review used different tools to measure EI, which could have affected the comparability of the findings. To address this, we used SMD to combine and report the results across studies. Third, although the Begg and Egger tests were employed to assess publication bias, it is important to note that these tests were applied to only eight studies included in the meta-analysis, which is below the recommended threshold of ten studies for reliable results. Consequently, the statistical power of these tests may be limited, potentially affecting the robustness of our findings regarding publication bias. Finally, the high heterogeneity among the included studies was another limitation of this review. Despite conducting a subgroup analysis based on study design and population characteristics, homogeneity was only established for the subgroup of case-control studies and the general population. The remaining subgroups exhibited significant heterogeneity, which may impact the overall interpretation of the results. Nevertheless, this meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the potential role of EI as a protective factor against suicidal behaviors and highlights the need for further research in this area.

Based on these findings, health policy recommendations could include the integration of EI training programs into suicide prevention strategies. These programs could be offered to individuals who are at a higher risk for suicide such as those with a history of mental illness or those experiencing significant life stressors. Additionally, mental health professionals could integrate EI assessments into their clinical practice to identify individuals who may benefit from targeted EI interventions. Further research is needed to determine the most effective ways to incorporate EI training and assessment into suicide prevention efforts. However, the findings of this meta-analysis suggest that enhancing EI may be a promising strategy for reducing suicide risk.

Conclusion

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that EI may serve as a protective factor against suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Individuals with higher levels of EI may possess better emotional regulation skills, social support, and coping mechanisms, ultimately reducing their susceptibility to suicide. However, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the moderate variability between studies and the limited number of studies exploring the connection between EI and suicide. Further research is necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the potential impact of EI in preventing suicidal behaviors.

Acknowledgments

The results were derived as part of a Ph. D. thesis in Psychology. The authors would like to acknowledge the Vice-Chancellor for Research and Technology at Azad University for approving the study.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests related to the publication of this study.

Ethical Approval

This study is a review article that does not involve human or animal subjects. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on the topic.

Funding

No financial support was provided for this study.

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperative. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
2. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. New York: UNDP; 2023.
3. Darvishi N, Farhadi M, Azmi-Naei B, Poorolajal J. The role of problem-solving skills in the prevention of suicidal behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18(10):e0293620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293620 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
4. Darvishi N, Farhadi M, Poorolajal J. The role of social support in preventing suicidal ideations and behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Health Sci 2024; 24(2):e00609. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2024.144 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
5. Landry L. Why Emotional Intelligence is Important in Leadership. Harvard Business School; 2023. Available from: https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/emotional-intelligence-in-leadership. Updated April 3, 2019. Accessed May 31, 2023.
6. Ciarrochi J, Forgas JP, Mayer JD. Emotional Intelligence in Everyday Life. London: Psychology Press; 2001.
7. Abdollahi A, Carlbring P, Khanbani M, Abdollahi Ghahfarokhi S. Emotional intelligence moderates perceived stress and suicidal ideation among depressed adolescent inpatients. Pers Individ Dif 2016; 102:223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.015 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
8. Barekatain M, Tavakoli M, Neshat-Doost HT. The study of emotional intelligence in women who attempted suicide with the poisoning. Int J Psychol 2008; 43(3-4):520. [ Google Scholar]
9. Gómez-Romero MJ, Limonero JT, Toro Trallero J, Montes-Hidalgo J, Tomás-Sábado J. Relationship between emotional intelligence and negative affect on suicide risk in young university students. Ansiedad y Estrés 2018; 24(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.anyes.2017.10.007 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
10. Kopera M, Jakubczyk A, Klimkiewicz A, Suszek H, Krasowska A, Brower KJ. Relationships between components of emotional intelligence and suicidal behavior in alcohol-dependent patients. J Addict Med 2018; 12(1):24-30. doi: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000358 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
11. Korkmaz S, Danacı Keleş D, Kazgan A, Baykara S, Gürkan Gürok M, Feyzi Demir C. Emotional intelligence and problem-solving skills in individuals who attempted suicide. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 74:120-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.02.023 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
12. Moayedi F, Hajializadeh K, Khakrah M, Hosseini Teshnizi S. Emotional intelligence in suicide commiters. Life Sci J 2014; 11:65-8. [ Google Scholar]
13. Motahari AA, Rahgozar S. Inhibitory role of emotional intelligence in committing suicide. Indian J Sci Technol 2011; 4(11):1561-6. [ Google Scholar]
14. Okasha TA, Abdelsamei AM, Radwan DN, Eissa OA, Elrassas HH. Impaired emotional intelligence is related to symptoms severity and suicidal attempts in depression. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2023; 69(1):56-62. doi: 10.1177/00207640211067887 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
15. Sojer P, Kainbacher S, Hüfner K, Freudenthaler H, Kemmler G, Deisenhammer EA. The association of intrapersonal trait emotional intelligence and resilience with suicidal ideation in university students. Psychiatr Danub 2021; 33(3):298-305. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2021.298 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
16. Gómez Tabares AS, Agudelo Osorio MP, Nunez C, Caballo VE. Suicidal risk and its relation with emotional intelligence and self-esteem in university students. Ter Psicol 2020; 38(3):403-26. doi: 10.4067/s0718-48082020000300403 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
17. Domínguez-García E, Fernández-Berrocal P. The association between emotional intelligence and suicidal behavior: a systematic review. Front Psychol 2018; 9:2380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02380 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
18. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. UK, Glasgow: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2019.
19. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses. 2018. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
20. National Institutes of Health (NIH). Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Form for Cohort Studies. NIH; 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115843/bin/appe-fm3.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2025.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327(7414):557-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
22. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315(7109):629-34. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
23. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50(4):1088-101. [ Google Scholar]
24. Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry 2020; 81(5):20f13681. doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13681 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
25. Colman A. A Dictionary of Psychology. 3rd ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2008.
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About Mental Health. Atlanta: CDC; 2023. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mentalhealth/learn/index.htm. Updated April 25, 2023. Accessed June 6, 2023.
27. Taylor GJ, Parker JD, Bagby RM. Emotional intelligence and the emotional brain: points of convergence and implications for psychoanalysis. J Am Acad Psychoanal 1999; 27(3):339-54. doi: 10.1521/jaap.1.1999.27.3.339 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
28. Bar-On RE, Parker JD. The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence. San Francisco: Wiley; 2000.
29. Ciarrochi J, Deane FP, Anderson S. Emotional intelligence moderates the relationship between stress and mental health. Pers Individ Dif 2002; 32(2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00012-5 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
30. Amiri B, Pourreza A, Rahimi Foroushani A, Hosseini SM, Poorolajal J. Suicide and associated risk factors in Hamadan province, west of Iran, in 2008 and 2009. J Res Health Sci 2012; 12(2):88-92. [ Google Scholar]
31. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet 2009; 373(9672):1372-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60372-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
32. Poorolajal J, Goudarzi M, Gohari-Ensaf F, Darvishi N. Relationship of religion with suicidal ideation, suicide plan, suicide attempt, and suicide death: a meta-analysis. J Res Health Sci 2022; 22(1):e00537. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2022.72 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
33. Poorolajal J, Rostami M, Mahjub H, Esmailnasab N. Completed suicide and associated risk factors: a six-year population-based survey. Arch Iran Med 2015; 18(1):39-43. [ Google Scholar]
34. Poorolajal J. Equivalence model: a new graphical model for causal inference. Epidemiol Health 2020; 42:e2020024. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2020024 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]