J Res Health Sci. 20(3):e00485. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2020.19Original Article
A Positive Association between a Western Dietary Pattern and High LDL-C among Iranian Population
Zahra Asadi 1, 2, Meysam Moghbeli 3, Sayyed Saeid Khayyatzadeh 4, Maryam Mohammadi Bajgiran 3, Roshanak Ghaffarian Zirak 3, Reza Zare-Feyzabadi 3, Marziyeh Eidi 3, Mahdi Taheri bonakdar 3, Hafeze Davari 3, Ali Asghar Mahmoudi 3, Nazanin Sheikh Andalibi 3, Gordon A.Ferns 5, Hamideh Ghazizadeh 2, 3, 6, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan 3, 6, *
1Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3Department of Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4Metabolic Syndrome Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5Nutrition and Food Security Research Centre, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
6Brighton & Sussex Medical School, Division of Medical Education, Falmer, Brighton, UK
7International UNESCO Center for Health-Related Basic Sciences and Human Nutrition, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
*Correspondence: Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan (PhD) Tel: +98 51 38002289 Fax: +98 51 38002287 E-mail: ghayourm@mums.ac.ir
Abstract
Background: The association between the presence of dyslipidemia and major dietary patterns was examined in an adult Iranian population.
Study design: A cross-sectional study.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 4672 adults aged 35-65 yr old based on data from the Mashhad Stroke And Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) Study initiated in 2010. Anthropometric and blood laboratory measurements were collected for all participants. Dietary intake was assessed using a validated 65-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Dietary patterns were identified using factor analysis.
Results: The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was 88% including elevated total cholesterol (38.9%), triglyceride (35.2%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (35.3) or decreased level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (68.9%). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, participants with higher scores for a Western pattern with lower physical activity level and educational attainment, and higher current smoking habit, increased the risk of having a raised LDL-C (OR=1.17; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.34; P =0.02). However, there was no significant association between adherence to this dietary pattern and other types of dyslipidemia. There was no significant association between a balanced dietary pattern and dyslipidemia and its components (OR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.68, 1.18; P =0.431).
Conclusion: Dyslipidemia was more prevalent among individuals with higher consumption of a western dietary pattern. A direct association was found between adherence to Western dietary pattern and LDL-C level.
Keywords: Dyslipidemia, Dietary patterns, FFQ
Copyright
© 2020 The Author(s); Published by Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Introduction
Elevation of serum lipid concentrations [total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), or a reduction of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] is defined as dyslipidemia
1
. The prevalence of high total cholesterol (total cholesterol ≥ 200 mg/dl) varies with regions so that this disease is more widespread in Europe (54%) and the United states (48%) compared to the Southeast Asia (29%)
2
. In a systematic meta-analysis study, the prevalence of dyslipidemia defined as high total cholesterol (≥ 200 mg/dl), high TG (≥ 150 mg/dl), high LDL-C (≥ 130 mg/dl) or a low HDL-C (< 40 in males and < 50 in females) among Iranian adults were reported 41.6%, 46%, 35.5% and 43.9% respectively
3
. Compared with other Asian countries, dyslipidemia has a high prevalence in Iran. Dyslipidemia contributes to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD)
4
. A positive association was found between serum total cholesterol level and myocardial infarction (MI) risk among Iranian males
5
. CVD is associated with a high mortality and morbidity rate in Iran and is a major public health problem
6
. The management of dyslipidemia requires changing lifestyle behaviors such as weight reduction, increasing physical activity and modifying dietary intake
7
.
The associations of dietary patterns with diseases have drawn the attention of scientists recently since dietary patterns are representative of the overall diet of individuals and may be used to indicate changes in dietary intake over time
8
.
An association was reported between a ‘prudent’ dietary pattern and serum HDL-C in both sexes, whereas the intake of coffee, fat and sweets was associated with a high LDL-C in men, while no association was found between westernized pattern with several dyslipidemia components including high LDL-C or low HDL-C
9
. A study among preschool children demonstrated an increased prevalence of high LDL-C in those with lower scores of a mixed pattern similar to ‘balanced’ dietary pattern with consumption of all food groups
10
. In contrast, in a cross-sectional study of 9725 Korean adults, a ‘balanced’ dietary pattern was not significantly associated with dyslipidemia
11
, and in a sample of 583 Iranian female teachers, a ‘western’ dietary pattern was not found to be associated with dyslipidemia, whilst a healthy dietary pattern was associated with a decreased the risk of dyslipidemia
12
.
Several studies have considered the dietary sources of energy and their association with abnormal lipid profile. A prospective study of 18 countries reported an association of higher dietary total fat with increased most of lipid profile components, and higher dietary carbohydrate intake with decreased most of these components
13
. In a recent study, a positive association was found between a high percentage of energy from carbohydrate and high TG and low HDL-C and a negative association with higher total cholesterol and LDL-C among Korean adults. However, dietary fat intake increased the risk of high total cholesterol and high LDL-C and decreased the risk of low HDL-C and high TG
14
.
We aimed to identify major dietary patterns among an Iranian population and the relationship between these dietary patterns with various types of dyslipidemia.
Methods
Study population
This cross-sectional study was based on data from the Mashhad Stroke And Heart Atherosclerotic Disorder (MASHAD) Study initiated in 2010 to explore the association of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with different risk factors among 9704 individuals of Mashhad City with the age range of 35 to 65 years
15
. Subjects with incomplete FFQ, energy consumption of <800 kcal or >4200 kcal, and missing data on blood lipid profile (TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C) were excluded from the study. In addition, subjects taking medication to lower serum lipids were excluded. The remaining 4672 subjects were included, which was about 48% of total population of MASHAD Study.
Dyslipidemia diagnosis
According to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' guidelines, dyslipidemia has been defined as a serum total cholesterol ≥200 mg/dl or TG ≥150 mg/dl or LDL-C ≥130 mg/dl or low HDL-C <40 mg/ dL in males and <50 mg/ dL in females
16
.
Anthropometric measurements
Weight (kg), height (cm), waist circumference (cm), hip circumference and mid-upper arm circumference were precisely measured by health care professionals according to standard protocols
17
. Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by dividing WC to HC. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight to height square.
Laboratory evaluation
The blood samples of all participants were collected after 14 h overnight fast. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C were assessed by enzyme-based methods on an automated analyzer
1
. A standard mercury sphygmomanometer was used to measure blood pressure. The blood pressure was assessed twice with a 30-min interval and the average of the two measurements was decided to be the final blood pressure.
Dietary pattern assessment
Dietary intake of all subjects was recorded by a 65-item validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)
18
. The questionnaire was comprised of 65 food items with the frequency of consumption (per day, week, month, rarely and never) and serving size for each food item. The questionnaire of all subjects was completed by expert nutritionists through a face-to-face interview. The analysis was performed based on principal components factor analysis (PCA) method
19
. Varimax rotation was used to keep factors uncorrelated
20
. To decide on the number of components of dietary patterns, factors with an eigenvalue >1, the interpretability and the screen test were used
20
. Factor scores were measured by weighting the food groups/ items according to their factor loadings
20
. Foods/food groups with factor loadings <0.20 were excluded. Finally, two major dietary patterns were identified, labeled as Balanced and Western dietary patterns. Every subject received a score for each dietary pattern. Thereafter, the dietary patterns were used to divide the group into tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) for data comparisons. The first tertile (T1) was defined as the reference group.
Physical activity level
The physical activity level of participants was measured by completing The James and Schofield human energy requirements equations. In this questionnaire, the questions were separated into work time activities, leisure time activities and resting time in bed
21
.
Other variables
Information about socio-demographic (gender, age, marital status and education), medical history (medication treatment) and lifestyle (smoking status) variables were collected through a comprehensive questionnaire at baseline.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analysis were performed using SPSS ver. 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kruskal-Wallis tests with a Bonferroni Post-Hoc correction were used to report distribution differences for qualitative and quantitative data respectively across tertiles of the dietary patterns. Sex-adjusted means for quantitative variables across each dietary pattern tertile were calculated using univariate model. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dyslipidemia were calculated using multinomial logistic regression across tertiles of dietary patterns, taking the lowest tertile group as the reference group. The calculated ORs were adjusted for potential confounders including sex, age, body mass index (m/kg
2
), physical activity level, smoking status (never, past, and current), education level, marital status and total energy intake. A P -value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (No. 85134).
Results
The data was analyzed for 4672 men and women of MASHAD study population. Major characteristics of participants according to demographic and lifestyle variables, physical measurements and lipid and metabolic markers are presented in Table 1. Mean BMI was 27.94 ± 4.67 kg/m2 and the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was 12% and 9.6% respectively. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was high, is estimated to be approximately 88% in total (a high serum TC, high TG, high LDL-C and low HDL-C were observed among 38.9%, 35.2%, 35.3% and 68.9% of the study population respectively).
Table 1.
Characteristics of the participants
Demographic and lifestyle
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Gender, male | 1969 | 42.1 |
Age range (yr) |
|
|
35-44 | 1493 | 32.0 |
45-54 | 1933 | 41.4 |
55-65 | 1245 | 26.6 |
Marriage status |
|
|
Single/ divorced/ widow | 335 | 7.2 |
Married | 4337 | 92.8 |
Education level |
|
|
Low | 2551 | 54.8 |
Moderate | 1770 | 38 |
High | 336 | 7.2 |
Smoking status |
|
|
Nonsmoker | 3195 | 68.4 |
Ex-smoker | 477 | 10.2 |
Current smoker | 1000 | 21.4 |
Physical activity level |
|
|
Sedentary | 1131 | 25.3 |
Low active | 1213 | 27.2 |
Active | 1645 | 36.8 |
Very active | 478 | 10.7 |
Dyslipidemia | 4103 | 87.8 |
Physical measurements
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Body mass index (kg/m²) | 27.9 | 4.6 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 95.2 | 12.1 |
Hip circumference (cm) | 103.5 | 9.1 |
Waist-to-hip ratio | 0.9 | 0.0 |
Mid-upper arm circumference (cm) | 30.3 | 3.4 |
Lipid and metabolic markers |
|
|
Fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) | 92.5 | 38.6 |
Serum Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 192.4 | 38.5 |
Serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl) | 119.3 | 34.5 |
Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dl) | 41.8 | 9.3 |
laboratory measurements
|
Median
|
Interquartile range
|
Serum triglyceride (mg/dl) | 122 | 87 to 176 |
Two major dietary patterns were identified among the study population: A ‘‘Balanced’’ dietary pattern was characterized by high positive loadings for the consumption of green leafy vegetables, other vegetables, fruits, dairy products, red meats, poultry, legumes, nuts and seafoods. The second pattern labeled ‘‘Western’’ dietary pattern showed positive loadings for the consumption of sugar, egg, fast foods, tea, snacks, potato, carbonated beverages, pickled foods, organ meat, nuts and butter (Table 2).
Table 2.
Factor-loading matrix for the major factors (dietary patterns) identified by using food consumption data from the food-frequency questionnaire used in the MASHAD cohort study
Food groups
|
Balanced pattern
|
Other vegetables | 0.621 |
Green vegetables | 0.589 |
Fruits | 0.543 |
Dairy | 0.484 |
Red meats | 0.429 |
Poultry | 0.336 |
Legumes | 0.285 |
Nuts | 0.271 |
Sea foods | 0.261 |
Food groups
|
Western pattern
|
Sugars | 0.552 |
Eggs | 0.479 |
Fast foods | 0.460 |
Tea | 0.415 |
Snacks | 0.410 |
Potato | 0.394 |
Carbonated beverages | 0.368 |
Pickled foods | 0.337 |
Organs meat | 0.309 |
Butter | 0.281 |
Refined grains | - |
Whole grains | - |
Coffee | - |
Foods or food groups with factor loadings <0.20 for both factors were excluded
In the Balanced dietary pattern, there were significant between-group differences concerning education level, smoking status, weight, height, BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and triglyceride (TG) concentration (Table 3). Comparing the highest versus the lowest tertile of the Balanced dietary pattern, the participants tended to have higher educational attainment (P <0.001), be current smokers (P <0.001) whereas, they had a lower WC (P =0.001) and WHR (P =0.001).
Table 3.
Baseline characteristics and nutrient intake of participants according to tertiles of balanced dietary pattern
Categorical variables
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
P
value
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
Female | 1058 | 55.6 | 1113 | 55.9 | 471 | 60.6 |
|
|
|
|
Male | 845 | 44.4 | 878 | 44.1 | 307 | 39.4 |
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Low | 870 | 46.1 | 1411 | 70.9 | 270 | 34.7 |
|
|
|
|
Moderate | 747 | 39.6 | 480 | 24.1 | 336 | 43.2 |
|
|
|
|
High | 271 | 14.3 | 100 | 5.0 | 172 | 22.1 |
|
|
|
|
Smoking status |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Non smoker | 1337 | 70.2 | 1296 | 65.1 | 562 | 72.2 |
|
|
|
|
Ex – smoker | 207 | 10.9 | 204 | 10.2 | 66 | 8.5 |
|
|
|
|
Current smoker | 359 | 18.9 | 491 | 24.7 | 150 | 19.3 |
|
|
|
|
Physical activity level |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.028 | 0.028 |
Sedentary | 491 | 26.9 | 434 | 22.7 | 206 | 28.1 |
|
|
|
|
Low active | 491 | 26.9 | 530 | 27.8 | 192 | 26.2 |
|
|
|
|
Active | 660 | 36.2 | 721 | 37.7 | 264 | 36.0 |
|
|
|
|
Very active | 181 | 10.0 | 225 | 11.8 | 72 | 9.7 |
|
|
|
|
Marriage status |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Single/divorced/widow | 43 | 5.4 | 120 | 6.3 | 172 | 8.6 |
|
|
|
|
Married | 747 | 94.6 | 1771 | 93.7 | 1819 | 91.4 |
|
|
|
|
Dyslipidemia |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.410 | 0.410 | 0.410 | 0.410 |
Total (N) | 1686 | 88.6 | 1737 | 87.2 | 687 | 88.3 |
|
|
|
|
Continuous variables
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Age, year a
| 49.29 | 0.18 | 48.98 | 0.18 | 49.57 | 0.28 | 0.171 | 0.676 | 1.000 | 0.224 |
Body mass index (kg/ m²)a
| 28.23 | 0.10 | 27.56 | 0.10 | 28.23 | 0.16 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.000 | 0.001 |
Cholesterol (mg/dl)a
| 193.04 | 0.88 | 191.35 | 0.86 | 193.60 | 1.37 | 0.247 | 0.506 | 1.000 | 0.492 |
LDL (mg/dl)a
| 118.61 | 0.79 | 120.51 | 0.77 | 117.89 | 1.23 | 0.104 | 0.258 | 1.000 | 0.214 |
HDL (mg/dl) a
| 41.97 | 0.21 | 41.86 | 0.20 | 41.80 | 0.32 | 0.876 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Energy (kcal/day) | 2061.42 | 12.03 | 1781.46 | 11.76 | 2458.18 | 18.82 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Carbohydrate (g/day) b
| 273.37 | 39.30 | 296.49 | 36.01 | 251.53 | 51.98 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Protein (g/day) b
| 75.20 | 10.33 | 69.70 | 8.71 | 80.29 | 15.64 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Fat (g/d)b
| 67.14 | 14.86 | 60.27 | 12.97 | 73.36 | 18.83 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Cholesterol (mg/day)b
| 212.80 | 69.72 | 192.86 | 63.96 | 233.16 | 95.84 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Fiber (g/day)b
| 26.33 | 7.35 | 25.33 | 7.35 | 27.43 | 8.78 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Continuous variables
|
Median
|
Interquartile
range
|
Median
|
Interquartile
range
|
Median
|
Interquartile
range
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 124 | 89 to 179 | 118 | 85 to 169 | 128 | 89 to 184 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 1.000 | 0.001 |
T1: first tertile; T2: second tertile; T3: third tertile of the balanced dietary pattern.
LDL: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL: density lipoprotein cholesterol
The nutrient intake of individuals was compared across tertiles for the balanced dietary pattern (Table 3). Individuals in the highest tertile of the Balanced pattern consumed higher energy, protein, total fat, cholesterol and fiber and lower carbohydrate (P <0.001).
Between-group comparison of the tertiles for the Western dietary pattern showed that there were significant differences among participants considering age, education level, smoking status, physical activity level (PAL), height, mid-upper arm circumference (MAC), prevalence of dyslipidemia, TG and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (Table 4). Those in the second tertile for the Western pattern were younger and participants of the highest tertile were less likely to have high educational attainment compared to the lowest tertile (P <0.001). Current smoking and sedentary lifestyle were more prevalent among those with a high western pattern score (P <0.001). Comparing anthropometric measurements, those in the upper tertile of Western pattern have higher height (P <0.001) and MAC (P =0.010). As we expected, the prevalence of dyslipidemia was higher in the last tertile of Western pattern (P <0.001), despite lower TG of the highest tertile compared to the first tertile (P =0.002).
Table 4.
Baseline characteristics and nutrient intake of participants according to tertiles of Western dietary pattern
Categorical variables
|
T1
|
T2
|
T3
|
P
value
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Number
|
Percent
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Female | 1267 | 66.2 | 247 | 37.2 | 1191 | 56.9 |
|
|
|
|
Male | 647 | 33.8 | 417 | 62.8 | 903 | 43.1 |
|
|
|
|
Education |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Low | 1077 | 56.4 | 305 | 46.2 | 1170 | 56.1 |
|
|
|
|
Moderate | 684 | 35.8 | 320 | 48.4 | 764 | 36.6 |
|
|
|
|
High | 149 | 7.8 | 36 | 5.4 | 152 | 7.3 |
|
|
|
|
Smoking status |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Non smoker | 1443 | 75.4 | 358 | 53.9 | 1394 | 66.6 |
|
|
|
|
Ex – smoker | 186 | 9.7 | 88 | 13.3 | 203 | 9.7 |
|
|
|
|
Current smoker | 285 | 14.9 | 218 | 32.8 | 497 | 23.7 |
|
|
|
|
Physical activity level |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Sedentary | 393 | 21.6 | 228 | 35.5 | 482 | 25.5 |
|
|
|
|
Low active | 462 | 25.4 | 200 | 31.2 | 520 | 27.5 |
|
|
|
|
Active | 743 | 40.7 | 156 | 24.3 | 704 | 37.2 |
|
|
|
|
Very active | 224 | 12.3 | 58 | 9.0 | 185 | 9.8 |
|
|
|
|
Marriage status |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Single/divorced/widow | 170 | 8.9 | 27 | 4.0 | 138 | 6.6 |
|
|
|
|
Married | 1737 | 91.1 | 645 | 96.0 | 1955 | 93.4 |
|
|
|
|
Dyslipidemia |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Total | 1724 | 41.9 | 545 | 13.3 | 1841 | 44.8 |
|
|
|
|
Continuous variables
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Mean
|
SD
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Age (yr) a
| 51.35 | 0.18 | 46.90 | 0.30 | 47.97 | 0.17 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Body mass index (kg/ m²)a
| 28.14 | 010 | 27.76 | 0.18 | 27.82 | 0.10 | 0.046 | 0.199 | 0.076 | 1.000 |
Cholesterol (mg/dl)a
| 193.62 | 0.88 | 189.30 | 1.50 | 192.30 | 0.83 | 0.043 | 0.042 | 0.826 | 0.244 |
LDL (mg/dl)a
| 119.03 | 0.79 | 115.99 | 1.35 | 120.60 | 0.75 | 0.010 | 0.164 | 0.445 | 0.009 |
HDL (mg/dl) a
| 41.61 | 0.21 | 41.98 | 0.35 | 42.12 | 0.20 | 0.197 | 1.000 | 0.223 | 1.000 |
Energy (kcal/day) | 1724.13 | 11.25 | 2631.32 | 19.10 | 2077.22 | 10.76 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Carbohydrate (g/day) b
| 274.49 | 37.02 | 282.57 | 60.67 | 283.14 | 42.23 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Protein (g/day) b
| 77.20 | 10.19 | 68.85 | 15.71 | 72.11 | 9.97 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Fat (g/d)b
| 65.27 | 12.92 | 66.75 | 21.98 | 64.78 | 15.40 | 0.018 | 0.008 | 0.579 | 0.012 |
Cholesterol (mg/day)b
| 194.53 | 56.57 | 244.88 | 110.95 | 207.90 | 68.99 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Fiber (g/day)b
| 27.17 | 6.96 | 23.48 | 8.73 | 25.94 | 7.80 |
| 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Continuous variables
|
Median
|
Interquartile range
|
Median
|
Interquartile range
|
Median
|
Interquartile range
|
Total
|
T1 vs T2
|
T1 vs T3
|
T2 vs T3
|
Triglyceride (mg/dl) | 122 | 87 to 176 | 118 | 79 to 175 | 120 | 87 to 169 | 0.002 | 0.008 | 0.002 | 0.575 |
Abbreviations: T1: first tertile, T2: second tertile, T3: third tertile of Western dietary pattern.
Participants with a high Western pattern diet, had higher dietary energy, carbohydrate and cholesterol while they consumed less fiber and protein compared with those with lower Western pattern scores (P <0.001).
The balanced dietary pattern showed no significant association with age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CI) of dyslipidemia or its components (Table 5). Although crude and age-adjusted ORs for a high serum TG were decreased in the second tertile of the balanced pattern compared to the reference tertile, after adjusting for all possible confounders this significant association was disappeared.
Table 5.
Odds ratio (95% confidence intervals) of dyslipidemia according to tertiles of balanced dietary pattern
Variables
|
Number
|
Crude OR (95% CI)
|
P
value
|
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
a
|
P
value
|
Dyslipidemia |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 1686 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 1737 | 0.88 (0.73, 1.07) | 0.960 | 0.95 (0.77, 1.17) | 0.732 |
Third tertile | 687 | 0.97 (0.75, 1.26) | 0.829 | 0.90 (0.68, 1.18) | 0.431 |
High cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 746 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 748 | 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) | 0.272 | 0.98 (0.85, 1.12) | 0.308 |
Third tertile | 323 | 1.10 (0.93, 1.30) | 0.267 | 1.08 (0.90, 1.29) | 0.383 |
High triglyceride |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 712 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 657 | 0.82 (0.72, 0.94) | 0.015 | 0.86 (0.75, 1) | 0.056 |
Third tertile | 302 | 1.05 (0.88, 1.25) | 0.574 | 1.04 (0.86, 1.25) | 0.688 |
High low density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 652 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 721 | 1.09 (0.95, 1.24) | 0.315 | 1.14 (0.99, 1.31) | 0.366 |
Third tertile | 285 | 1.11 (0.93, 1.32) | 0.243 | 1.11 (0.92, 1.33) | 0.266 |
Low high density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 1110 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 1135 | 0.95 (0.83, 1.07) | 0.726 | 1.09 (0.92, 1.29) | 0.515 |
Third tertile | 453 | 0.99 (0.84, 1.18) | 0.949 | 1.01 (0.81, 1.26) | 0.911 |
a ORs were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking status, education level, marital status, and total energy intake.
After adjustment for age and other possible confounding factors, ORs of dyslipidemia were decreased in the second tertile of Western pattern versus the first tetile, however, these associations were not significant in the third tertile of Western pattern compared to the first tertile. We also found lower crude and age-adjusted ORs of high TC, but not multivariable adjusted OR, in T2 versus T1 of Western pattern.
Although crude and age-adjusted ORs of high serum TG were significantly decreased across tertiles of Western pattern (ORs = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.89; P <0.001), however after adjustment for possible confounding factors this association was no longer significant. The age-adjusted ORs of a high serum TG in the highest versus lowest tertile of the Western pattern was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.94; P =0.005, and the multivariable ORs of high serum TG was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.01; P =0.062).
We also found positive association between adherence to Western pattern and LDL-C. The multivariable ORs of high LDL-C in the highest versus lowest tertile of Western dietary pattern was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.34; P = 0.020).
The Western pattern was negatively correlated with HDL-C in the present study. The crude ORs of low HDL-C in the second tertile of Western pattern was 2.27 (95% CI: 1.87, 2.75; P <0.001) compared to the lowest tertile. Whereas, the age-adjusted ORs of low HDL-C in the second versus first tertile of Western dietary pattern was 2.22 (95% CI: 1.82, 2.69; P <0.001). Moreover, the crude ORs of low HDL-C in the highest tertile of Western pattern was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.05m 1.36; P =0.005) compared to the lowest tertile. Whereas, the age-adjusted ORs of low HDL-C in the highest versus lowest tertile of Western dietary pattern was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.33; P =0.014). However, there was no significant association between a Western pattern and multivariable ORs of low HDL-C (OR= 0.86 (95% CI: 0.73, 1.01) P =0.067) (Table 6).
Table 6.
Odds ratio (95% CIs) of dyslipidemia according to tertiles of Western dietary pattern
Variables
|
Number
|
Crude OR (95% CI)
|
P
value
|
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
a
|
P
value
|
Dyslipidemia |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 1724 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 545 | 0.50 (0.39, 0.65) | 0.001 | 0.64 (0.49, 0.84) | 0.001 |
Third tertile | 1841 | 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) | 0.030 | 0.86 (0.70, 1.07) | 0.185 |
High cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 794 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 223 | 0.71 (0.59, 0.86) | 0.001 | 0.98 (0.80, 1.19) | 0.572 |
Third tertile | 800 | 0.87 (0.77, 1.00) | 0.060 | 1.05 (0.91, 1.20) | 0.493 |
High triglyceride |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 745 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 230 | 0.83 (0.69,1.00) | 0.084 | 0.84 (0.69, 1.03) | 0.054 |
Third tertile | 696 | 0.78 (0.69, 0.89) | 0.001 | 0.81 (0.71, 1.01) | 0.062 |
High low density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 686 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 204 | 0.79 (0.65, 0.95) | 0.013 | 0.96 (0.78, 1.18) | 0.834 |
Third tertile | 768 | 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) | 0.583 | 1.17 (1.02, 1.34) | 0.020 |
Low high density lipoprotein cholesterol |
|
|
|
|
|
First tertile | 1016 | 1.00 |
| 1.00 |
|
Second tertile | 478 | 2.27 (1.87, 2.75) | 0.001 | 0.98 (0.76, 1.26) | 0.098 |
Third tertile | 1204 | 1.20 (1.05, 1.36) | 0.005 | 0.86 (0.73, 1.01) | 0.067 |
a ORs were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity level, smoking status, education level, marital status, and total energy intake.
Discussion
In the present study, the two major dietary patterns were distinct among the study population and were a combination of healthy and unhealthy food items. This could have contributed to the lack of significant associations of these dietary patterns with dyslipidemia. The balanced dietary pattern that showed positive loading factors for vegetables, fruits, dairy products, poultry, legumes, nuts and seafoods as well as red meats, was not related to abnormal lipid profile. The Western pattern showed positive loading factors for sugars, fast foods, tea, snacks, potato, carbonated beverages, pickled foods, organ meat, butter, nuts and egg increased the risk of high LDL-C.
In the current study, we observed a significant difference of education levels between the highest and lowest tertiles of the balanced dietary pattern, in which the group in the highest tertile of this dietary pattern had noticeably higher levels of university education compared to the lowest tertile (22.1% vs 14.3%). However, another study reported that there was inverse correlation between college education levels and healthy diet, in which the females who have college educations tend toward fast foods and unhealthy diets
22
. Moreover, those participants who were in the highest tertile of Western dietary pattern had a higher education level than those in the lowest tertile
23
.
We also observed a significant difference in smoking habit between the highest and lowest tertiles (23.7% vs 14.9%) of western dietary pattern. There were complex relationships between the presence of dyslipidemia and daily energy and fat intakes in the balanced and western dietary patterns. Although consumption of dietary total energy and fat were higher in the last tertile of the balanced dietary pattern compared to the first tertile, adherence to this healthy dietary pattern was correlated with lower prevalence of dyslipidemia in our results. On the other hand, adherence to western pattern with a lower dietary intake of total fat was associated with a higher dyslipidemia prevalence. These results are consistent with previous studies reported that high dietary fat intake is not an unavoidable factor for dyslipidemia
24,25
.
The psychological/ behavioral factors may explain these findings; the cases with dyslipidemia may have a greater tendency to decrease their daily energy and fat intakes compared to the cases who have normal lipid profiles. It may be expected to see higher physical activity among individuals with dyslipidemia compared to the other cases as we have observed among our cases. Lack of awareness and education about dyslipidemia can be a barrier to a healthy lifestyle. The educated cases with high awareness of their health status had more tendency for healthy diet and behavior
26
. Indeed such behaviors can also be associated with the levels of education among the cases, in which the majority of highly educated cases were observed in the first tertile of the balanced dietary pattern compared to the other tetiles. Behavioral factors can affect the levels of serum cholesterol and susceptibility to specific diseases
27,28
. The type A behavior pattern (TABP) is associated with serum cholesterol levels and LDL-C
29
. Type D behavior pattern is also characterized by negative emotions such as depression, psychological stress, and anxiety
28
. Type D personality is associated with CVD and metabolic syndrome
30,31
, related to the plasma lipid levels
31
. Dyslipidemia is also associated with type D personality through the cortisol as a mediator between type D personality and hyperlipidemia
32
. Psychological stress can also increase the cardiovascular risk through unhealthy behaviors including smoking and a sedentary lifestyle or overactivation of autonomous sympathetic nervous system
33,34
. Occupational stress is significantly associated with dyslipidemia
35
. We observed that although the highest tertile of the balanced dietary pattern had higher daily energy, fats, and cholesterol intake than the lowest tertile, such cases had lower incidences of dyslipidemia.
There are some other important factors involving in dyslipidemia such as daily fiber intake which was higher among those with the highest score of Balanced pattern. This highlights the inevitable role of fiber as a treatment option for dyslipidemia. Fiber is derived from plants that are generally resistant toward the human digestive enzymes. Dietary fiber intake reduces risk of different diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity
36-38
. Moreover, it improves serum lipid concentrations
39
and weight loss
40
. High-dose fiber intake has beneficial influence on cholesterol cardiovascular risk factors
41
. Additionally, a significant relationship was shown between dietary Trans fatty acid and total sugar intake with adiposity
42
.
The balanced pattern, as the healthy pattern, was not correlated to dyslipidemia while the western pattern was positively associated with high LDL-C risk among a subpopulation of Iranian adults.
We observed some inconsistencies between the energy intake and daily fat intake and the prevalence of dyslipidemia in subjects with balanced dietary patterns associated with the daily fiber intake. Moreover, psychological factors such as job stress and awareness can also be involved in such inconsistencies between the balanced dietary pattern and dyslipidemia which require further psychological assessments. Factor analysis, as an exploratory method, was used to obtain major dietary patterns of the study population and factor interpretation was made based on subjective decision that affects the interpretation of the results.
There were some limitations in the present study: the design of the study was cross-sectional and thus demonstrated uncertain causality between dietary patterns and dyslipidemia.
Conclusion
A balanced dietary pattern with high intake of green leafy vegetables, other vegetables, fruits, dairy products, red meats, poultry, legumes, nuts, and seafoods showed no significant association with dyslipidemia and its components, while adherence to Western dietary pattern with high intake of sugar, egg, fast foods, tea, snacks, potato, carbonated beverages, pickled foods, organs meat, and butter was positively associated with LDL-C level among the study population. More studies are required to confirm these findings.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Mashhad University of Medical Science Research Council for its financial supports. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Ethics number: IR.MUMS.REC.1386.250).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose
Funding
This work was supported by a grant (Majid Ghayour Mobarhan) from Mashhad University of Medical Science (MUMS), Iran.
Highlights
The overall prevalence of dyslipidemia was reported 88% in Iranian population.
Dyslipidemia was more prevalent among individuals with higher consumption of a western dietary pattern.
In participants with higher scores for a western pattern increased the risk of having a raised LDL-C.
There was no association between a balanced dietary pattern with high intake of dietary fiber and dyslipidemia.
References
- Barzegar-Amini M, Ghazizadeh H, Reza Seyedi SM, Sadeghnia HR, Mohammadi A, Hassanzade-Daloee M. Serum vitamin E as a significant prognostic factor in patients with dyslipidemia disorders. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2019; 13(1):666-71.
- Lin P, Chang CC, Yuan KC, Yeh HJ, Fang SU, Cheng T. Red blood cell aggregation-associated dietary pattern predicts hyperlipidemia and metabolic syndrome. Nutrients 2018; 10(8):1127-40.
- Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Qorbani M, Samavat T, Sharifi F, Larijani B, Fakhrzadeh H. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Int J Prev Med 2014; 5(4):373-93.
- Musunuru K. Atherogenic dyslipidemia: cardiovascular risk and dietary intervention. Lipids 2010; 45(10):907-14.
- Hedayatnia M, Asadi Z, Zare-Feyzabadi R, Yaghooti-Khorasani M, Ghazizadeh H, Ghaffarian-Zirak R. Dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease risk among the Mashad study population. Lipids Health Dis 2020; 19(1):42-53.
- Sadeghi M, Haghdoost AA, Bahrampour A, Dehghani M. Modeling the burden of cardiovascular diseases in Iran from 2005 to 2025: The impact of demographic changes. Iran J Public Health 2017; 46(4):506-16.
- Anderson TJ, Grégoire J, Hegele RA, Couture P, Mancini GJ, McPherson R. 2012 update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult. Can J Cardiol 2013; 29(2):151-67.
- Newby PK, Weismayer C, Akesson A, Tucker KL, Wolk A. Long-term stability of food patterns identified by use of factor analysis among Swedish women. Nutr J 2006; 136(3):626-33.
- Lee J, Kim J. Association between dietary pattern and incidence of cholesterolemia in Korean adults: the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Nutrients 2018; 10(1):53-69.
- Nobre LN, Lamounier JA, Franceschini Sdo C. Sociodemographic, anthropometric and dietary determinants of dyslipidemia in preschoolers. J Pediatr 2013; 89(5):462-9.
- Song SJ, Lee JE, Paik HY, Park MS, Song YJ. Dietary patterns based on carbohydrate nutrition are associated with the risk for diabetes and dyslipidemia. Nutr Res Pract 2012; 6(4):349-56.
- Esmaillzadeh A, Azadbakht L. Food intake patterns may explain the high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors among Iranian women. Nutr J 2008; 138(8):1469-75.
- Mente A, Dehghan M, Rangarajan S, McQueen M, Dagenais G, Wielgosz A. Association of dietary nutrients with blood lipids and blood pressure in 18 countries: a cross-sectional analysis from the PURE study. Lancet Diabetes Endo 2017; 5(10):774-87.
- Song S, Song WO, Song Y. Dietary carbohydrate and fat intakes are differentially associated with lipid abnormalities in Korean adults. J Clin Lipidol 2017; 11(2):338-47.
- Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Moohebati M, Esmaily H, Ebrahimi M, Parizadeh SM, Heidari-Bakavoli AR. Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) study: design, baseline characteristics and 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation. Int J Public Health 2015; 60(5):561-72.
- Jellinger P, Smith D, Mehta A, Ganda O, Handelsman Y, Rodbard H. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of atherosclerosis. Endocr Pract 2012; 18(Suppl 1):1-78.
-
Norton, Kevin, and Tim Olds, eds. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. UNSW Press, 1996.
- Ahmadnezhad M, Asadi Z, Miri HH, Ferns GA, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ebrahimi-Mamaghani M. Validation of a short semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adults: a pilot study. J Nutr Sci Diet 2017; 25:49-55.
- Pregibon D. Logistic regression diagnostics. Ann Stat 1981; 9(4):705-24.
- Moeller SM, Reedy J, Millen AE, Dixon LB, Newby PK, Tucker KL. Dietary patterns: challenges and opportunities in dietary patterns research: an Experimental Biology workshop 2006. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107(7):1233-9.
-
James WPT, Schofield EC, Human energy requirements. A manual for planners and nutritionists. Oxford University Press; 1990.
- Hidaka BH, Hester CM, Bridges KM, Daley CM, Greiner KA. Fast food consumption is associated with higher education in women, but not men, among older adults in urban safety-net clinics: A cross-sectional survey. Prev Med Rep 2018; 12:148-51.
- Asadi Z, Shafiee M, Sadabadi F, Heidari‐Bakavoli A, Moohebati M, Khorrami MS. Association of dietary patterns and risk of cardiovascular disease events in the MASHAD cohort study. J Hum Nutr Diet 2019; 32(6):789-801.
- Nazeminezhad R, Tajfard M, Latiff LA, Mouhebati M, Esmaeily H, Ferns GA. Dietary intake of patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease and that of healthy controls in Iran. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68(1):109-13.
- Ku CY, Gower BA, Nagy TR, Goran MI. Relationships between dietary fat, body fat, and serum lipid profile in prepubertal children. Obes Res 1998; 6(6):400-7.
- Park KS, Yoo JI, Kim HY, Jang S, Park Y, Ha YC. Education and exercise program improves osteoporosis knowledge and changes calcium and vitamin D dietary intake in community dwelling elderly. BMC Public Health 2017; 17(1):966.
- Sher L. Type D personality: the heart, stress, and cortisol. Q J Med 2005; 98(5):323-9.
- Cosci F. Assessment of personality in psychosomatic medicine: current concepts. Adv Psychosom Med 2012; 32:133-59.
- Weidner G, Sexton G, McLellarn R, Connor SL, Matarazzo JD. The role of Type A behavior and hostility in an evaluation of plasma lipids in adult women and men. Psychosom Med 1987; 49(2):136-45.
- Mols F, Martens EJ, Denollet J. Type D personality and depressive symptoms are independent predictors of impaired health status following acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2010; 96(1):30-5.
- Tziallas D, Kostapanos MS, Skapinakis P, Milionis HJ, Athanasiou T, Elisaf MS. The association between Type D personality and the metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study in a University-based outpatient lipid clinic. BMC Res Notes 2011; 4(1):105.
- Bagherian-Sararoudi R, Sanei H, Attari A, Afshar H. Type D personality is associated with hyperlipidemia in patients with myocardial infarction. J Res Med Sci 2012; 17(6):543-7.
- Brotman DJ, Golden SH, Wittstein IS. The cardiovascular toll of stress. Lancet 2007; 370(9592):1089-100.
- Heslop P, Smith GD, Carroll D, Macleod J, Hyland F, Hart C. Perceived stress and coronary heart disease risk factors: the contribution of socio‐economic position. Br J Health Psychol 2001; 6(2):167-78.
- Catalina-Romero C, Calvo E, Sánchez-Chaparro MA, Valdivielso P, Sainz JC, Cabrera M. The relationship between job stress and dyslipidemia. Scand J Public Health 2013; 41(2):142-9.
- Lairon D, Arnault N, Bertrais S, Planells R, Clero E, Hercberg S. Dietary fiber intake and risk factors for cardiovascular disease in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82(6):1185-94.
- Montonen J, Knekt P, Järvinen R, Aromaa A, Reunanen A. Whole-grain and fiber intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77(3):622-9.
- Whelton SP, Hyre AD, Pedersen B, Yi Y, Whelton PK, He J. Effect of dietary fiber intake on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Hypertens 2005; 23:475-81.
- Brown L, Rosner B, Willett WW, Sacks FM. Cholesterol-lowering effects of dietary fiber: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 1999; 69(1):30-42.
- Birketvedt GS, Shimshi M, Thom E, Florholmen J. Experiences with three different fi ber supplements in weight reduction. Med Sci Monitor 2005; 11(1):PI5-8.
- Zhou Q, Wu J, Tang J, Wang JJ, Lu CH, Wang PX. Beneficial effect of higher dietary fiber intake on plasma HDL-C and TC/HDL-C ratio among Chinese rural-to-urban migrant workers. Int J Env Res Pub He 2015; 12(5):4726-38.
- Rashidi AA, Bakavoli AR, Avan A, Aghasizade M, Ghazizadeh H, Tayefi M. Dietary Intake and Its Relationship to Different Body Mass Index Categories: A Population-Based Study. J Res Health Sci 2018; 18(4):e00426.