Logo-jrhs
J Res Health Sci. 2011;11(2): 83-90.
PMID: 22911957
  Abstract View: 110
  PDF Download: 38

Original Article

Relationship between Delivery Type and Menstrual Disorders: A Case-Control Study

Fatemeh Nahidi*, Leila Bagheri, Sharareh Jannesari, Hamid Alavi Majd
*Corresponding Author: Email: nahidifateme@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: High incidence of menstrual disorders at late ages of fertility accounts for 20% of clinical visits and 25% of gynecological surgeries. This study was conducted to identify the relationship between delivery type and menstrual disorders in women referring to hospitals affiliated to Medical Universities in Tehran in 2008.

Methods: In this case-control study, which was conducted from April to August, 2008 in Tehran, 160 women aged 36 to 44 years, 8o women with and 80 without menstrual disorder as case and control groups were enrolled respectively. Data collection tool was a questionnaire (included questions regarding demographic and obstetrical characteristics). Higham pictorial chart (scores more than 80 denoted menorrhagia), a verbal multidimensional scoring scale (from 0 for painless to 3 for severe pain), and Holmes-Rahe scale for assessing stress were used.

Results: About 93.1% of the cases and 65% of the controls had experienced dysmenorrhea at the begging of the study (P=0.009). In other words, 65% of women with dysmenorrhea had a history of C-section. Women with menstrual disorders had more caesarian sections (53.7%) than those without the disorders (27.5%) (P < 0.001) with an odds ratio estimate of 3.06 [95% CI: 1.58, 5.91]. There were significant differences in the number of pads/tampons used (P=0.009) and amount of uterine bleeding based on Higham chart (P=0.009) among case and control group.

Conclusion: Caesarian may be considered as a risk factor for menstrual disorders particularly at late ages of fertility. Therefore, pregnant women should be consulted by health providers regarding advantages versus disadvantages of caesarian before selective C-section.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 111

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 38

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 30 Jul 2011
Revision: 09 Oct 2011
ePublished: 09 Oct 2011
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)