Original Article

Trend Analysis of Suicide and Homicide Mortality and Years of Life Lost (YLL) in Children Aged 10-19 Years in the South of Iran, 2004-2019

Please cite this article as follows: Azarbakhsh H, Jafari F, Dehghani SP, Hamedi A, Sharifi MH, Mirahmadizadeh A. Trend analysis of suicide and homicide mortality and years of life lost (YLL) in children aged 10-19 years in the South of Iran, 2004-2019. J Res Health Sci. 2024; 24(1):e00606. doi:10.34172/jrhs.2024.141

Background

Unnatural deaths, including deaths resulting from intentional injuries such as homicide or suicide, are among the major global public health concerns.¹ This category of deaths is one of the leading causes of premature death, imposing a significant economic and societal burden on society.² Approximately 800 000 suicides occur worldwide annually (one death every 40 seconds).^3,4 The rate of suicide attempts is 10 to 20 times higher than completed suicides.⁴ Suicide attempts and suicidal behavior constitute the nineteenth leading cause of the global disease burden.⁵ The suicide rate varies across countries, ranging from 30 per 100 000 individuals per year in Russia to less than 1 per 100 000 individuals in Arab countries like Egypt.⁶ In Iran, a 20-year trend indicates a rise in suicide fatalities, with an average rate of 9.9 deaths per 100 000 individuals annually.⁷ Various studies have shown that the underlying factors contributing to suicide include personality traits (such as aggression), mental and physical disorders (like depression, pain, and disability), life events (such as the loss of friends or loved ones), social isolation, economic conditions, access to means of suicide, substance abuse, marital status, population density, birth rates, urban population, per capita income, unemployment rates, education, and religious affiliation.^6,8-10

In addition to suicide, intentional homicide has alarming statistics, with 470 000 people worldwide falling victim to homicide annually.^2,11 Approximately half of these victims are 10 to 29 years old, and 84% of homicides occur among men.² In Iran, the homicide rate is 6.5 per 100 000 individuals, with 80% of victims being male and an average age of 32.4 years.² The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that suicide is one of the top three leading causes of death in the 15 to 44 age group,¹² and homicide ranks as the fifth leading cause of death in the 10-14 age group.¹¹ Therefore, adolescence and early adulthood bear the most significant burden of premature deaths due to suicide and homicide. In other words, reducing mortality rates in this population segment prepares society for a healthier and better future. Suicide and homicide rates vary from one country to another and across different age groups of a country.⁶ In a study conducted in Ilam province from 2014 to 2018, the homicide and suicide rates were reported to be 8.1 and 20.7 per 100 000 individuals, respectively, with the highest number of suicide attempts observed in individuals aged 15 to 24 years. Furthermore, the suicide and homicide rates in this age group (15-24 years) were 33.9 and 9.1 per 100 000 individuals, respectively.² In a study conducted in Fars province during 2011-2018, the suicide rate was reported to be 9.68 per 100 000 individuals, with the highest number of years of life lost (YLL) observed in individuals aged 15 to 29.¹² Based on the results of the study, the number of YLL due to homicide was reported to be 1.37 per 1000 individuals in males and 0.29 per 1000 individuals in females. Additionally, the highest number of YLL due to homicide in both genders was observed in the 15-29 age group.¹¹ Various factors, including socioeconomic pressures, cultural factors, and literacy, play a role in the occurrence of homicides.¹¹

Examining these phenomena in different regions is important because different communities may be exposed to these events with varying conditions and risk factors. Additionally, calculating YLL serves as a fundamental measure for ranking the overall health status of a society and identifying its challenges to raise awareness and implement preventive measures.¹¹ YLL, defined as the number of years of death from a disease prior to death in the absence of that disease, is a measure of disease burden on the general population.¹³ Therefore, this study aims to provide details on mortality and YLL due to suicide and homicide in individuals aged 10-19 years in southern Iran from 2004 to 2019.

Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Fars province from 2004 to 2019. The data on all suicide and homicide deaths were extracted from the population-based electronic death registration system (EDRS) in the age group of 10-19 years and according to age, gender, and year of death based on ICD-10. The ICD-10 codes used in this study were X60-X84 for suicide and X85-Y09 for homicide.

The entry criteria included being 10-19 years of age and being a resident of Fars province. The total population of Fars province has been estimated using the basic data of health centers and the population and housing census from 1996 to 2016, taking into account the annual growth of the population. For standardization, the standard population of 2013 for countries with low and moderate incomes was used. Compared to this standard population, the standard population of the WHO has a lower proportion of the younger population and a higher proportion of those over 70 years old. As a result, it is not suitable for low- and middle-income countries where the proportion of young people is higher.¹⁴

Statistical analysis

First, descriptive statistics were reported as numbers and percentages. Afterwards, the crude mortality rates of suicide and homicide were calculated during the years of the study according to gender and year of death.

Then, YLL was calculated using the standard life table and determining life expectancy for different age (10-19 years) and gender groups, as well as the number of deaths due to suicide and homicide, in each age and gender group, based on the following equation.¹⁵

Which N is the number of deaths in a certain age and gender group; L is the standard life expectancy of the deceased people in the same age group and gender (males aged 10-14, females aged 10-14, males aged 15-19, and females aged 15-19); r is the discounting rate, which is equal to 0.03; β is the contractual rate in calculating the age value, which is equal to 0.04; C = an adjusted fixed value, which is equal to 0.1658; a = age at which death occurred; and e is constant and equal to 2.71

The analysis of the number of years of life lost due to suicide and homicide was done using the YLL template of 2015, WHO, in Excel spreadsheet version 2016.

Then, to examine the trend of crude mortality rate and YLL, joinpoint regression was used. Joinpoint regression analysis describes the trend of change in successive segments of time and the decrease or increase within each segment.³ To determine the direction and magnitude of recent trends, annual percentage change (APC) and average annual percentage change (AAPC) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the last 16 available years were evaluated. AAPC was calculated as the weighted geometric mean of different APCs from joinpoint regression analysis, with weights equal to the length of each segment during the specified time interval.¹⁶ A joinpoint of zero indicates a straight line, and the optimal number of joinpoints was identified using the Monte Carlo permutation method.¹⁷ Unlike linear regression which is based on slope, the log linear regression is based on the APC (i.e., the rates change at a constant percent per year). It can also be used to compare trends across scales.¹⁸ To estimate the APC, the following equation was used¹⁹:

When there are no joinpoints (i.e., no changes in trend), APC is constant, so it equals the AAPC. Otherwise, the whole period is segmented by the points with trend change.

An approximate 95% confidence interval is used for AAPC in AAPCL and AAPCU formulas:

Joinpoint Regression Program 4.9.1.0 was used to carry out the analysis of the trend.

Results

During the 16 years of the study (2004-2019), 563 cases of suicide and 218 cases of homicide in children aged 10-19 have occurred in Fars province. Based on the results, 61.3% of deaths caused by suicide and 79.4 % of deaths caused by homicide were observed in men.

The highest number of deaths in both genders occurred in the age group of 15-19 years (Table 1).

As can be seen in Figure 1, the crude mortality rate of suicide in men increased from 7.3 (per 100 000 population) in 2004 to 8.5 (per 100 000 population) in 2019 (P for trend = 0.030, AAPC = 4.9), and in women, it increased from 3.4 (per 100 000 population) in 2004 to 5.5 (per 100 000 population) in 2019 (P for trend = 0.241, AAPC = 2.8) (Figure 1).

Close

Figure 1.

The mortality rate due to suicide in children in Fars province during 2004-2019

Figure 1.

The mortality rate due to suicide in children in Fars province during 2004-2019

Moreover, the crude mortality rate of homicide in men increased from 2.8 (per 100 000 population) in 2004 to 2.9 (per 100 000 population) in 2019 (P for trend = 0.500, AAPC = -1.4), and in women, it decreased from 1.1 (per 100 000 population) in 2004 to 0.8 (per 100 000 population) in 2019 (P for trend = 0.903, AAPC = -0.5) (Figure 2).

Close

Figure 2.

The mortality rate due to homicide in children in Fars province during 2004-2019

Figure 2.

The mortality rate due to homicide in children in Fars province during 2004-2019

The total number of years of life lost due to suicide during the 16-year study period was 9766 (1.8 per 1000 people) in men, 6261 (1.2 per 1000 people) in women, and 16027 (1.5 per 1000 people) in both genders (male/female ratio, 1.6) (Table 1). Besides, the total number of years of life lost due to homicide was 4890 (0.9 per 1000 people) in men, 1294 (0.3 per 1000 people) in women, and 6184 (0.6 per 1000 people) in both genders (male/female ratio, 3.8) (Table 1).

The highest number of years of life lost due to suicide, according to the method of suicide, belonged to hanging (54.2%) and poisons and chemicals (10.4%) in men and self-immolation (36.2%) and hanging in women (23.9%) (Table 2).

According to the joinpoint regression analysis, the 16-year trend of YLL due to suicide was increasing in males; in other words, the annual percent change (APC) was 4.8% (95% CI 0.4 to 9.5, P = 0.036). In addition, stable trends were observed in females, and APC was 2.7% (95% CI -2.0 to 7.7, P = 0.241). The model did not show any join point; hence, the AAPC (Average Annual Percent Change) is the same as the APC (Figure 3). In addition, the trend of YLL due to homicide was stable, and APC was -1.6% (95% CI -5.6 to -2.6, P = 0.422) in males and it was -2.7% (95% CI -10.0 to 5.2, P = 0.467) in females. The model did not show any join point; hence, the AAPC is the same as the APC (Figure 4).

Close

Figure 3.

The trend of the number of years of life lost due to suicide in children aged 10-19 between 2004 and 2019

Figure 3.

The trend of the number of years of life lost due to suicide in children aged 10-19 between 2004 and 2019

Close

Figure 4.

The trend of the number of years of life lost due to homicide in children aged 10-19 between 2004 and 2019

Figure 4.

The trend of the number of years of life lost due to homicide in children aged 10-19 between 2004 and 2019

Discussion

This study was carried out to present the death rate due to suicide and homicide and to calculate the YLL of them. The results demonstrated that 563 cases of suicide and 218 cases of homicide occurred in children aged 10-19 in Fars province. School problems play a significant role in youth suicide, and many of the men and women who commit suicide are described by family, friends, and other acquaintances as sad and depressed. One study found that among suicide survivors with school problems (25% of the total), nearly one in eight had recently been bullied.²⁰ In general, there is a complex interaction of mental health and school stressors, and several opportunities for intervention and prevention of suicidal behavior are suggested. For example, limiting physical access to devices is important in suicide prevention activities and it has been shown to be effective in a number of studies.^21,22 Advances in various aspects of health care, including the development of emergency and trauma care systems, may play an important role in reducing homicide-related deaths.²³

In a study that examined the suicide status in 29 countries, it was shown that the rate of suicide in men is higher than in women, and it is higher in the age group of 15-19 years compared to the age group of 10-14 years,²⁴ which is in line with the results of the present study. Suicide data found in China showed that suicide rates are higher among young women than young men, contrary to what is seen in Western societies.²⁵ The higher rate of death due to suicide in the age group of 15-19 years justified that there are more mental problems, such as substance abuse.²⁶ Maturity or university entrance exams can also play a significant role.²⁷ It is also possible that other factors related to gender, such as aggression and drug use, play a role in increasing the suicide rate of men in some areas.²⁸ In Brazil, the highest rate of mortality due to homicide was observed in the age group of 15-19 years and the rate of mortality was higher in men compared to women.²⁹ Another reason for the higher number of deaths in men and people aged 15 to 29 is that they are in a more stressful situation than other groups. Additionally, they may have differences in attitude towards suicide.²

It can be concluded that the trend of death due to suicide is increasing in both genders. The same result was obtained in Korea and Japan. On the other hand, in some European countries, a decrease in the death rate was observed in men and an increase in women. Economic stagnation, inequality, and rapid changes in family structure may be effective factors in this process.^24,30-32 Several studies have offered explanations for this trend, such as restrictions on firearms and some degree of improvement in global health.^33,34 Regarding the rate of homicide deaths, in the study conducted by Canudas-Romo and Aburto, a decreasing trend was observed.³⁵ In our study, a small increase in death rate was observed in men and a decrease in women.

A study conducted in Australia showed that in the age group of 15-19 years, the number of YLL was higher in women than in men,³⁶ while in our study, for the entire period and both age groups, it was higher in men than in women for both suicide and homicide.

In our study, the increase in the trend of YLL due to suicide was significant in men but it was not significant in women, and the increase in the trend of YLL due to homicide was not significant in either gender. This is an indication that there has been suicide in men at a younger age in recent years, which is a warning for families, schools, and health officials to pay more attention to this group and investigate the reasons. The reasons include unhealthy friendships, parental quarrels, parents’ lack of attention to the child or excessive attention, and cyberspace. Homicide has different trends in various regions depending on the prevailing conditions in that society. For example, in the study conducted by Ruch et al in the United States, the trend of death caused by suicide was first increasing, then decreasing, and then increasing.³⁷ In the study conducted by Veisani et al in Ilam, the trend of death due to suicide was first decreasing and then increasing. The rate of mortality due to homicide was highest in 2017 and then it decreased.² In the study conducted by Ruch et al, the chosen approach of young women to commit suicide had changed towards the more violent and deadly method of hanging and suffocation, while in our study, the most commonly used method was self-immolation in women and hanging in men.³⁷ In another study, hanging and firearms were the top two methods used in suicide attempts in both genders.²⁰ It should be noted that a possible reason for the higher number of YLL in men is that men tend to use more lethal methods.²⁸ In some parts of our country, women may be more prone to self-immolation due to certain cultural reasons. Future studies are suggested to investigate the reasons for this.

Our results revealed the prominent contribution of the male gender and individuals aged 15-29 years to the YLL. Considering the preventability of most of these types of deaths, there is a national need to implement an effective intervention in health policies to get rid of the burden of suicide in Fars province. Reducing youth suicide requires a multifaceted approach. However, a number of systematic literature reviews have been conducted indicating that effective interventions for self-injurious behaviors in youth are largely insufficient.^38-40 Therefore, a new approach to suicide and homicide prevention is needed, with a strong national orientation supported by comprehensive and coordinated planning and implementation at the regional level.

The strength of the study is that it calculated YLL and mortality from intentional injuries over a long period of time using joinpoint regression in order to identify changes made to this index. Death records are mandatory in all provinces of Iran and as a result, the missing data in the study was minimal. One of the limitations of this study is that there may be incorrect encoding when deaths are recorded, leading to incorrect classification. The study also looked at a specific age group, and if all age groups were considered, we might see a lot of changes in the results.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of our study, the trend of mortality due to suicide is increasing in males and stable in females. Additionally, the number of YLL due to suicide has been increasing in men, and it has been stable in women. Moreover, the trend of mortality due to homicide was stable for both males and females. Therefore, it is necessary to take preventive actions, especially in men and vulnerable groups.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Health Vice-chancellor of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Authors’ Contribution

Conceptualization: Habibollah Azarbakhsh, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh.

Data curation: Fatemeh Jafari, Andishe Hamedi.

Formal analysis: Habibollah Azarbakhsh.

Funding acquisition: Alireza Mirahmadizadeh.

Investigation: Alireza Mirahmadizadeh

Methodology: Habibollah Azarbakhsh.

Project administration: Seyed Parsa Dehghani, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi.

Software: Habibollah Azarbakhsh.

Supervision: Habibollah Azarbakhsh.

Validation: Habibollah Azarbakhsh, Fatemeh Jafari, Andishe Hamedi.

Visualization: Habibollah Azarbakhsh, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi.

Writing–original draft: Habibollah Azarbakhsh, Fatemeh Jafari, Andishe Hamedi, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh.

Writing–review & editing: Habibollah Azarbakhsh, Fatemeh Jafari, Andishe Hamedi, Seyed Parsa Dehghani, Mohammad Hossein Sharifi Alireza Mirahmadizadeh.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical Approval

The protocol of this study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR.SUMS.REC.1399.772).

Funding

None.

References

1. Lukaschek K, Erazo N, Baumert J, Ladwig KH. Suicide mortality in comparison to traffic accidents and homicides as causes of unnatural death An analysis of 14,441 cases in Germany in the year 2010. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2012; 9(3):924-31. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9030924 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
2. Veisani Y, Bakhtiyari A, Mohamadian F. Years of life lost (YLLs) due to suicide and homicide in Ilam province: Iran, 2014-2018. Bull Emerg Trauma 2022; 10(1):16-20. doi: 10.30476/beat.2022.92045.1293 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
3. Mirahmadizadeh A, Moftakhar L, Dehghani SS, Hassanzadeh J, Dehghani SP, Azarbakhsh H. Mortality rate and years of life lost due to burns in southern Iran during 2004-2019: a population-based study. Arch Iran Med 2023; 26(4):205-11. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.31 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
4. Azarbakhsh H, Moftakhar L, Amiri S, Mirahmadizadeh A. Epidemiology of suicide by medication overdose: a population-based study 2011-2019. Arch Med Res 2022; 53(3):304-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.10.006 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
5. Moftakhar L, Mirahmadizadeh A, Amiri S, Rezaei F, Azarbakhsh H. Epidemiology of suicide by hanging in Fars province, Iran (2011-2019): a population-based cross-sectional study. J Prev Med Public Health 2023; 56(3):264-71. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.22.519 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
6. Bando DH, Lester D. An ecological study on suicide and homicide in Brazil. Cien Saude Colet 2014; 19(4):1179-89. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014194.00472013 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
7. Fakhari A, Farahbakhsh M, Davtalab Esmaeili E, Azizi H. A longitudinal study of suicide and suicide attempt in northwest of Iran: incidence, predictors, and socioeconomic status and the role of sociocultural status. BMC Public Health 2021; 21(1):1486. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11527-9 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
8. Hawton K, van Heeringen K. Suicide. Lancet 2009; 373(9672):1372-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60372-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
9. Rehkopf DH, Buka SL. The association between suicide and the socio-economic characteristics of geographical areas: a systematic review. Psychol Med 2006; 36(2):145-57. doi: 10.1017/s003329170500588x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
10. Boskabadi H, Bagheri F, Askari Hosseni Z. Developmental disorders in preterm neonates during the first two years of life using the ages and stages questionnaire. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2016; 18(2):7-13. doi: 10.22088/jbums.18.2.7.[Persian] [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
11. Azarbakhsh H, Hassanzadeh J, Dehghani SS, Janfada M, Sharifi MH, Mirahmadizadeh A. Trend analysis of homicide mortality and years of life lost in the south of Iran, 2004-2019. J Res Health Sci 2023; 23(1):e00573. doi: 10.34172/jrhs.2023.108 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
12. Mirahmadizadeh A, Rezaei F, Moftakhar L, Heiran N, Azarbakhsh H. Years of life lost due to suicide in southern Iran 2011-18: a population-based study. Arch Iran Med 2022; 25(1):12-6. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.03 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
13. Wakasugi M, Kazama JJ, Narita I. Premature mortality due to nephrotic syndrome and the trend in nephrotic syndrome mortality in Japan, 1995-2014. Clin Exp Nephrol 2018; 22(1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1417-6 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
14. Sankoh O, Sharrow D, Herbst K, Whiteson Kabudula C, Alam N, Kant S. The INDEPTH standard population for low- and middle-income countries, 2013. Glob Health Action 2014; 7:23286. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23286 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
15. Azarbakhsh H, Sharifi MH, Hassanzadeh J, Dewey RS, Janfada M, Mirahmadizadeh A. Diabetes in southern Iran: a 16-year follow-up of mortality and years of life lost. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2023; 43(4):574-80. doi: 10.1007/s13410-022-01125-9 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
16. Wong MC, Lao XQ, Ho KF, Goggins WB, Tse SL. Incidence and mortality of lung cancer: global trends and association with socioeconomic status. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1):14300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14513-7 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
17. Kim HJ, Fay MP, Feuer EJ, Midthune DN. Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med 2000; 19(3):335-51. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::aid-sim336>3.0.co;2-z [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
18. Alhassan JA, Adeyinka DA, Olakunde BO. Equity dimensions of the decline in under-five mortality in Ghana: a joinpoint regression analysis. Trop Med Int Health 2020; 25(6):732-9. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13391 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
19. Dragomirescu I, Llorca J, Gómez-Acebo I, Dierssen-Sotos T. A join point regression analysis of trends in mortality due to osteoporosis in Spain. Sci Rep 2019; 9(1):4264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40806-0 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
20. Karch DL, Logan J, McDaniel DD, Floyd CF, Vagi KJ. Precipitating circumstances of suicide among youth aged 10-17 years by sex: data from the National Violent Death Reporting System, 16 states, 2005-2008. J Adolesc Health 2013; 53(1 Suppl):S51-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.028 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
21. Yip PS, Caine E, Yousuf S, Chang SS, Wu KC, Chen YY. Means restriction for suicide prevention. Lancet 2012; 379(9834):2393-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60521-2 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
22. Florentine JB, Crane C. Suicide prevention by limiting access to methods: a review of theory and practice. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70(10):1626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.029 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
23. Amanat M, Naghdi K, Saeedi Moghaddam S, Ahmadi N, Rezaei N, Saadat S. The trend of interpersonal violence mortality at national and provincial levels in Iran from 1990 to 2015. J Interpers Violence 2021; 36(21-22):10239-66. doi: 10.1177/0886260519883869 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
24. Roh BR, Jung EH, Hong HJ. A comparative study of suicide rates among 10-19-year-olds in 29 OECD countries. Psychiatry Investig 2018; 15(4):376-83. doi: 10.30773/pi.2017.08.02 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
25. Phillips MR, Li X, Zhang Y. Suicide rates in China, 1995-99. Lancet 2002; 359(9309):835-40. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07954-0 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
26. Brent DA, Baugher M, Bridge J, Chen T, Chiappetta L. Age- and sex-related risk factors for adolescent suicide. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1999; 38(12):1497-505. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00010 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
27. Mokhtari AM, Gholamzadeh S, Salari A, Hassanipour S, Mirahmadizadeh A. Epidemiology of suicide in 10-19 years old in southern Iran, 2011-2016: a population-based study on 6720 cases. J Forensic Leg Med 2019; 66:129-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.06.018 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
28. Beautrais AL. Suicide and serious suicide attempts in youth: a multiple-group comparison study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160(6):1093-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1093 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
29. Arnold MW, Neto GH, Figueiroa JN. Years of potential life lost by children and adolescent victims of homicide, Recife, 1997. J Trop Pediatr 2002; 48(2):67-71. doi: 10.1093/tropej/48.2.67 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
30. Cuadrado C, Zitko P, Covarrubias T, Hernandez D, Sade C, Klein C. Association between adolescent suicide and sociodemographic factors in Chile: cross-sectional ecological study. Crisis 2015; 36(4):281-90. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000324 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
31. Otzen T, Sanhueza A, Manterola C, Escamilla-Cejudo JA. [Trends in suicide mortality in Chile from 1998 to 2011]. Rev Med Chil 2014; 142(3):305-13. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872014000300004.[Spanish] [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
32. Puzo Q, Qin P, Mehlum L. Long-term trends of suicide by choice of method in Norway: a joinpoint regression analysis of data from 1969 to 2012. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:255. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2919-y [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
33. Värnik A, Kõlves K, Allik J, Arensman E, Aromaa E, van Audenhove C. Gender issues in suicide rates, trends and methods among youths aged 15-24 in 15 European countries. J Affect Disord 2009; 113(3):216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.004 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
34. Kõlves K, De Leo D. Adolescent suicide rates between 1990 and 2009: analysis of age group 15-19 years worldwide. J Adolesc Health 2016; 58(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.014 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
35. Canudas-Romo V, Aburto JM. Youth lost to homicides: disparities in survival in Latin America and the Caribbean. BMJ Glob Health 2019; 4(2):e001275. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001275 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
36. Kinchin I, Doran CM. The cost of youth suicide in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15(4):672. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040672 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
37. Ruch DA, Sheftall AH, Schlagbaum P, Rausch J, Campo JV, Bridge JA. Trends in suicide among youth aged 10 to 19 years in the United States, 1975 to 2016. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2(5):e193886. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3886 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
38. Robinson J, Cox G, Malone A, Williamson M, Baldwin G, Fletcher K. A systematic review of school-based interventions aimed at preventing, treating, and responding to suicide-related behavior in young people. Crisis 2013; 34(3):164-82. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000168 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
39. Zalsman G, Hawton K, Wasserman D, van Heeringen K, Arensman E, Sarchiapone M. Suicide prevention strategies revisited: 10-year systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3(7):646-59. doi: 10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30030-x [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
40. Harrod CS, Goss CW, Stallones L, DiGuiseppi C. Interventions for primary prevention of suicide in university and other post-secondary educational settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014(10):CD009439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009439.pub2 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]